Reconstructed ACL Reconstructed Anterior Cruciate Ligament

►Home
►Appointment Info
►Contact Us
►Laser Hair
►Hormones
►Dr. Darrow Videos

►Prolotherapy
►Acute Pain
►Chronic Pain
►Pain Management
►Types of Chronic Pain
►Pain Management Drugs
►Pain and Acupuncture
►Electrical Stimulation
►Nerve Blocks

►Radio Shows OnLine

Second-look arthroscopy of reconstructed ACL
Researchers writing in the medical journal Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy say "second-look arthroscopy of reconstructed ACL in good clinical outcome patients showed approximately 10% partial graft tear, 5% poor synovial coverage, 20% cyclops-like lesion, and 40% some notch reformation"

Ahn JH, Yoo JC, Yang HS, Kim JH, Wang JH. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Mar;15(3):242-8. Second-look arthroscopic findings of 208 patients after ACL reconstruction.

The aim of this study is to report the arthroscopic subjective findings of reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with good clinical outcome. Graft used for reconstruction was either patella bone-tendon-bone (PBTB) autograft or hamstring tendon [quadrupled semitendinous and gracilis tendon (QSGT)] autograft. From March 1997 to September 2003, among 716 ACL reconstructions 209 knees (208 patients) were available for second-look arthroscopy at a mean 21.2-month (range, 14-70 months) postoperative period. The second-look arthroscopy focused on the evaluation of (1) continuity of the reconstructed ACL graft, (2) subjective graft tension using a probe, (3) the extent of synovial coverage, (4) the prevalence of cyclops or cyclops-like lesion, and (5) bony change after notchplasty.

Patellar tendon autograft was used in 80 knees, hamstring tendon autograft in 129 knees.

Just prior to second-look arthroscopy two objective clinical evaluations, KT-2000 arthrometer and Lysholm knee score, were performed to verify good clinical outcomes. A comparison between the hamstring tendon group and the patella tendon group, hamstring group showed slightly better results in Lysholm knee scores and KT-2000 arthrometer but there were no statistically significant differences (p>0.05).

Undetected partial graft tear was seen in 21 knees (10%).

With regard to graft tension, a total of 181 grafts (87%) showed normal tension and 28 (13%) showed slight lax tension. The overall synovial coverage was poor in nine (4%) knees.

The synovial coverage was slightly better in the hamstring tendon group. A total of 45 knees (21.5%) showed cyclops-like lesion in variable sizes and locations. Reformation of the notch was seen in 85 knees (40%).

In conclusion, the findings of second-look arthroscopy of reconstructed ACL in good clinical outcome patients showed approximately 10% partial graft tear, 5% poor synovial coverage, 20% cyclops-like lesion, and 40% some notch reformation.

►Back Pain
►Elbow Pain
►Golf Injuries
►Headaches
►Hip Pelvic Pain
►Knee Pain
►Neck Pain
►Shoulder Pain
►Whiplash
►Wrist Pain
►Side Effects of
Prolotherapy

A Multi-Disciplinary Clinic For Professional and Amateur Athletes and Chronic Pain Sufferers
11645 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 120 Los Angeles, CA (310) 231-7000

Patient's stories herein, and the language used, is intended to inform and educate. HOWEVER, it does not imply that you or anyone else will receive the same outcome.

Prolotherapy and other modalities mentioned are medical techniques that may not be considered mainstream. As with any medical procedure, results will vary among individuals, and there could be pain or substantial risks involved. These concerns should be discussed with your health care provider prior to any treatment so that you have proper informed consent and understand that there are no guarantees to healing.

Neither Dr. Darrow, nor any associate of Joint Rehab offer medical advice on this website. This information is offered for educational purposes only. Do not act or rely upon our information without seeking independent professional medical advice. The transmission of this information does not create a physician-patient relationship between you and Dr. Darrow or any associate of Joint Rehab. Neither Dr. Darrow, nor any associate of Joint Rehab guarantees the accuracy, completeness, usefulness, or adequacy of any resources, information, apparatus, product, or process available at or from this transmission. The photos in this Web site feature models for illustrative purposes and do not depict real patients.

JOINT REHABILITATION & SPORTS MEDICAL CENTER, INC IS HIPAA COMPLIANT. HIPPA IS SHORT FOR THE HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT. HIPAA PROTECTS PATIENTS' PRIVACY & PERSONAL HEALTHCARE INFORMATION.